Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

NOTIZIE GIURIDICHE

1 aprile 2025

Minori: genitori responsabili se non controllano i profili social dei figli.

In materia di danno cagionato dall’incapace, poiché l’art. 2046 c.c. configura una forma di responsabilità diretta, fondata sull’inosservanza del dovere di vigilanza sul soggetto incapace, il danneggiato deve dimostrare solamente che il danno è stato cagionato da un incapace (elemento positivo), mentre il sorvegliante deve dimostrare di non aver potuto evitare il fatto (elemento negativo), ovverosia individuare uno specifico ostacolo che, di fatto, ha impedito di esercitare la dovuta sorveglianza sull’incapace. Lo stabilisce il Tribunale di Brescia, sez. I, sentenza 4 marzo 2025, n. 879.

Chiamaci!
Scrivici su WhatsApp